Flat fee vs performance fee: which agency model is fairer?

A flat fee is a fixed monthly amount; a performance fee is a percentage of realised revenue. The difference decides whether you pay for effort or for results.

By
DIKKE KASSA editors
European affiliate team
Topic
Comparisons
Read time
2 min read

Verdict

A combination works best: a fixed fee that covers operational work plus a small percentage that aligns interests. Pure flat rewards standing still; pure performance rewards short-term harvesting.

Upsides and risks of a flat fee

A fixed fee is predictable, easy to budget and keeps the agency independent of revenue spikes. You know exactly what a country costs per month.

The risk: when the fee is disconnected from results, there is little financial incentive to grow the programme.

Upsides and risks of a performance fee

A percentage of revenue puts risk on the agency: no revenue, no fee. That feels fair and keeps focus on growth.

The risk: an agency paid only on revenue may lean on cashback and coupon partners that mostly claim existing sales.

Why a hybrid model wins

A base fee creates room for work that pays off later: publisher recruitment, feed optimisation and opening a new market.

A performance component keeps the agency growing with your results. DIKKE KASSA therefore uses €299 per country per month plus 3% of realised affiliate revenue.

What to check in the contract

Confirm which revenue the percentage applies to: gross, or net of returns and rejected orders. Always calculate on validated revenue.

Also record what is included per country, the notice period, and who owns accounts and data if you leave.

Frequently asked questions

Ready toring the register?

Tell us about your shop and your markets. You get a concrete plan with pricing.